tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post984556905660620383..comments2024-01-08T09:37:04.406+01:00Comments on RÉSONAANCES: James Hartle about GravityJesterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08947218566941608850noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-43462037755520191382007-05-13T19:32:00.000+01:002007-05-13T19:32:00.000+01:00jester, perhaps you are right. Yet, the LHC is ord...jester, perhaps you are right. Yet, the LHC is orders of magnitude more complex than two spacecrafts. And still, if the machine will produce the SM + an additional unexpected (but persistent) signal, then the possibility of new physics won't be ruled out just because the signal is more likley to come from a bug in the software or hardware defects...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-28769114658762407582007-05-11T15:06:00.000+01:002007-05-11T15:06:00.000+01:00ofer, i believe in the RTGs as an explanation. I t...ofer, i believe in the RTGs as an explanation. I think in this case Ockham's razor is particularly sharp.Jesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16844247827820646813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-23615544470970477252007-05-08T19:43:00.000+01:002007-05-08T19:43:00.000+01:00jester,perhaps ``discrepancy'' is too strong, but ...jester,<BR/>perhaps ``discrepancy'' is too strong, but how would you classify a decade-persistent anomalous shift in the trajectory of two spacecrafts embedded in a weak gravitational field?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-12569545243809413102007-05-08T11:20:00.000+01:002007-05-08T11:20:00.000+01:00Ofer, there was no mention of the Pioneer anomaly....Ofer, there was no mention of the Pioneer anomaly. And that's fine. I also wouldn't count it as a discrepancy with GR.Jesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16844247827820646813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-11814809851712368752007-05-03T20:51:00.000+01:002007-05-03T20:51:00.000+01:00Is it not funny that there is no record kept of pa...Is it not funny that there is no record <BR/>kept of past talks from the CERN theory group except this blog? Who knows, one might find in the transparencies more stuff than the limited second hand information passed in here. <BR/><BR/>It is rather sad that the very popular, very easy, very useful, and very much CERN-developed tool (agenda.cern.ch) <BR/>for cataloging seminar series, meetings<BR/>and conferences is not known to the <BR/>theory groupAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-82282971888801391262007-05-03T17:41:00.000+01:002007-05-03T17:41:00.000+01:00Did he point any discrepancy with GR? Did he menti...Did he point any discrepancy with GR? Did he mention the Pioneer anomalous shift?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-50919805920030060132007-04-30T15:14:00.000+01:002007-04-30T15:14:00.000+01:00"standard Google talk" is a good one. I think you ..."standard Google talk" is a good one. I think you just coined an instant classic!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com