tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post2553337743078962633..comments2024-01-08T09:37:04.406+01:00Comments on RÉSONAANCES: Dr Jekyll and Mr HiggsJesterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08947218566941608850noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-63227415890776029342009-05-14T15:58:00.000+01:002009-05-14T15:58:00.000+01:00I hear little higgs models are now dead, after it ...I hear little higgs models are now dead, after it was shown they are actually inconsistent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-47603522452135719042009-04-16T00:08:00.000+01:002009-04-16T00:08:00.000+01:00Chivukula's slides:
http://www.yale.edu/LSD/talks/...Chivukula's slides:<br />http://www.yale.edu/LSD/talks/Chivukula.pdf<br /><br />"Technicolor: Higgsless since 1976!" is on page 6.David Schaichhttp://physics.bu.edu/~schaich/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-85291972738530375582009-03-23T20:33:00.000+01:002009-03-23T20:33:00.000+01:00Moffat, be careful with the second Pauli principle...Moffat, be careful with the second Pauli principle...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-56140841645335522542009-03-23T16:38:00.000+01:002009-03-23T16:38:00.000+01:00No Higgs added:the classical atomNo Higgs added:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://classicalatom.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">the classical atom</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-84260092596603665862009-03-18T00:41:00.000+01:002009-03-18T00:41:00.000+01:00A quote from a talk I once saw by Sekhar Chivukula...A quote from a talk I once saw by Sekhar Chivukula:<BR/><BR/>"Technicolor: Higgsless since xxxx"<BR/><BR/>I forget the date, but obviously it was late 70s.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-10821374738131818552009-03-01T23:48:00.000+01:002009-03-01T23:48:00.000+01:00There is by now a relatively large number of compe...There is by now a relatively large number of competing Higgs-less models. Below I mention three papers where masses of both fermions and vector bosons follow from the nonlinear dynamics of Yang-Mills-Dirac theory. Results are entirely non-perturbative in nature and in good agreement with experimental data:<BR/><BR/>1) http://ejournals.wspc.com.sg/journals/ijbc/18/1803/S0218127408020756.html<BR/><BR/>2) http://www.j-npcs.org/abstracts/vol2005/v8no4/v8no4p366.html<BR/><BR/>3) http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0295-5075/82/1/11001Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-78671845992721005542009-03-01T21:52:00.000+01:002009-03-01T21:52:00.000+01:00The anonymous jester has not read recent papers of...The anonymous jester has not read recent papers of mine in collaboration with Viktor Toth. See: arXiv:0812.1991, A finite electroweak model without a Higgs particle, J. W. Moffat, V. T. Toth and arXiv:0812.1994, The running of coupling constants and unitarity in a finite electroweak model, J. W. Moffat, V. T. Toth. See also my recent seminar at Perimeter Institute: Redesigning Electroweak Theory: Does the Higgs Particle Exist? Ultimately, the Tevatron and the LHC should decide whether the Higgs particle exists or not. I claim that it does not but we shall see.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-31710074812837556092009-02-28T21:39:00.000+01:002009-02-28T21:39:00.000+01:00No Higgs, no SUSY, no string theory. The universe...No Higgs, no SUSY, no string theory. The universe is not constrained to validate curve fitting when physics gets a wild hair up its fundament to approximate sine curves with polynomials.<BR/><BR/>Theorists boast promiscuity while empiricists pay child support. Theory predicts what it is told to predict. If you want to find the bottleneck, the first place to look is at the top of the bottle.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com