*Nature*magazine:

There is nothing exotic here: these 4-fermion operators are predicted by the Standard Model, as they are effectively induced by the Z boson exchange between electrons and quarks. Their effect is that left- and right-handed polarized electrons interact differently with quarks. Thus, they lead to different cross sections for left- and right-hand electron scattering on atoms. The left-right asymmetry -- the difference of these two cross section normalized to the sum -- is a convenient observable to measure in a experiment. In fact, the asymmetry was experimentally observed already back in 1978 at SLAC, and at the time it was an important confirmation of the Standard Model structure of weak interactions. Nevertheless, it makes sense to measure the asymmetry (and therefore the parameters

*Cq*) more precisely so as to test the Standard Model predictions. There are two ways new physics could affect this observable. On one hand, the couplings of the Z boson to electrons and/or quarks could be modified, and then the Z boson exchange diagrams would lead to different coefficients

*Cq*than the ones predicted by the Standard Model. On the other hand, new heavy vector boson with mass

*M*interacting with electrons and quarks with strength g would induce contact interactions between the two that would effectively shift the parameter

*Cq*by the amount of order

*g^2 v^2/M^2*.

Now the parameters C1u and C1d have been measured quite precisely, with 3% accuracy, and they agree well with the Standard Model predictions (see here for the most recent update). This can be translated as order 1% constrains on the Z boson couplings to quarks and leptons. It is worth stressing that for the couplings to quarks these are the most stringent constraints to date (better than the ones from LEP) so these experiments are really exploring new territories.

The parameters C2u and C2d are more tricky because, in order to access them in scattering experiments, one needs to resolve the internal structure of the target atom. Here enters the PVDIS experiment at Jlab. They studied the left-right asymmetry of deep-inelastic polarized electron scattering on deuterons. They were able to demonstrate, for the first time, that a particular combination

*2 C2u - C2d*is non-zero, in agreement with the Standard Model. The resulting constraints on the Z-boson couplings are weaker than those coming from previous experiments. However, since they probe different operators, the provide non-trivial constraints on some new physics, in particular those that produces only

*C2q*and not

*C1q*. The plot reproduced at the top of this post is a more graphic presentation of their results. In the plot, the combined constraints from several low-energy experiments are recast in terms of the scale

*Λ*=Mass/coupling of new physics that contributes to the

*C1q*and

*C2q*coefficients. The yellow and red regions show the new physics reach before and after including the PVDIS results. The exciting thing about the plot is that it explicitly shows these experiments probe the mass scales of order 10 TeV, which is well beyond the reach of the LHC.

Complementary constraints from ATLAS can be found here.

Hi Jester,

ReplyDeleteIt sems that the plot should be rotated 90° clockwise...

For me it looks perfect.

ReplyDeleteI wonder if these

ReplyDeletelips;-) could tell us something about the following hypothesis from Pierre Fayet in his last paper on arxiv"the 125 GeV/c2 boson recently observed at CERN may also

be interpreted, up to a mixing angle induced by supersymmetry breaking, as the spin-0 partner of the Z under two supersymmetry transformations"... (http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5951)

It's good to see that you don't need a huge hardon collider to explore virgin territory in new physics.

ReplyDeleteCédric, this kind of experiments best constrains new heavy vector bosons, so there is little impact on SUSY, whether the usual N=1 or Fayet's N=2

ReplyDeleteI agree with Anonymous. The plot needs to be rotated by -pi/2 so we can read the axis labels without getting a crick in our necks.

ReplyDeletei think it's a question of taste

ReplyDeleteAlmost beats the "Cosmological" fingers of God

ReplyDeletehttp://www.google.co.uk/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/mpa/research/current_research/hl2006-2/fig2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/mpa/research/current_research/hl2006-2/hl2006-2-en.html&h=600&w=600&tbnid=f2N2BMvdbQyutM&zoom=1&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__nDE8DR4E86uUUr1pibuGC9DjjjY=

You think upside-down text is a matter of taste?

ReplyDeleteSome people are a bit slow to get a joke, it seems...

ReplyDeletecan be paired with this one: http://i1.minus.com/ibc8PpumarGmtz.jpg

ReplyDeleteThis definitely shows an attractive way forward. I hope the authors will persevere in these delicate investigations!

ReplyDeleteSome people are a bit

ReplyDeleteit seems...too civilized to "get" such "jokes",(Adam, what did you take before posting this?)

The joke (and I use the term loosely) would still work if you flipped it 180 degrees. And there wouldn't be any upside-down text. *dusts off hands, nods smugly*

ReplyDeleteI'll send you a bar of soap. What is your address.

ReplyDeleteThere are approved but unfunded follow-up experiments planned at Jefferson Lab: PVDIS as part of the SoLID collaboration would be a direct successor to the experiment discussed here. MOLLER would attempt to use Moller scattering to measure Qweak at yet smaller Q. Even if funded soon, results on either are a decade out. It will be 2015 before the final Qweak measurements are published. There is a PVES collaboration at Mainz, too, that is planning a long PVES run at low energy.

ReplyDeleteHi, reading the paper, they seems to use an old (yes, customary but crazy) normalization according to which the coupling constant is assumed to be g^2=4pi.

ReplyDeleteThis is nearly strong coupling.

If we reduce to more reasonable values of g=1 or 0.5 as in weak interactions, the bounds go down to ~1.5TeV.

And BTW, for exactly the same reason, it is not true that LHC can not reach up to 7 TeV, it depends on the coupling. If you assume a strong coupling LHC can go way up... look at 4quark contact interactions etc.

cheers,

F