tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post9060916920095147413..comments2024-01-08T09:37:04.406+01:00Comments on RÉSONAANCES: Theorists vs multi-muonsJesterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08947218566941608850noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-77372773406932157442009-02-24T02:35:00.000+01:002009-02-24T02:35:00.000+01:00Underestimating hadronic punch-through.Underestimating hadronic punch-through.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-50539280597962319642009-02-22T14:45:00.000+01:002009-02-22T14:45:00.000+01:00hi Anonymous, do you have a SM interpretation in t...hi Anonymous, do you have a SM interpretation in terms of some detector effect? <BR/><BR/>Given that theorists are spending time on "LHC olympics", working on the muon anomaly at worst is a "CDF olympics".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-90072633665242622482009-02-20T21:17:00.000+01:002009-02-20T21:17:00.000+01:00As a CDF'er I think the common opinion is that the...As a CDF'er I think the common opinion is that the effect is very real - which has been verified by countless other experimenters - but that the new physics interpretation is premature at best and downright silly at worst. Comments like "that crap" are either referring to the written paper - which I would agree with - or are an emotional reaction based on the person performing the analysis. <BR/><BR/>I do agree that no theorist should be spending time on this though. It's an interesting experimental problem which happened to be noticed by a very polarizing person.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com