tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post4903752556350538204..comments2024-01-08T09:37:04.406+01:00Comments on RÉSONAANCES: UT fit longo magis quam acri belloJesterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08947218566941608850noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-38704193050609941482008-03-27T15:19:00.000+01:002008-03-27T15:19:00.000+01:00I meant the standard model :-)I meant the standard model :-)Jesterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16844247827820646813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-20283572340310683722008-03-26T14:36:00.000+01:002008-03-26T14:36:00.000+01:00So, who's playing Lucretia here? Systematic uncert...So, who's playing Lucretia here? Systematic uncertainties or theoretical prejudice?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-47941564768790190302008-03-25T15:57:00.000+01:002008-03-25T15:57:00.000+01:00Hi jester,again thank you for the link. I definite...Hi jester,<BR/><BR/>again thank you for the link. I definitely owe you a beer by now.<BR/><BR/>A comment. The 5.something sigma evidence ppt you point to is all for a fourth generation. Have you seen the latest search results by CDF ? There is a yummy bump at 400 GeV in the t' spectrum... See today's entry in my blog ;-) <BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/>T.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2846514233477399562.post-55689669437821372292008-03-25T15:14:00.000+01:002008-03-25T15:14:00.000+01:00maybe mine is a biased prejudice, but anyway: what...maybe mine is a biased prejudice, but anyway: what bit of "standard model prediction" takes into account the systematic uncertainty stemming from bad theory control over hadronic effects? it's hard to accept that the strong phases / hadronic matrix elements involved in such a process as Bs -> J/Psi phi are so well known that one is in a position to actually make a claim....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com