April Fools is over; I'm staying dead serious for the rest of the year. The most serious things in the months before the first LHC results are dark matter searches high and low. Here is another idea what they might find.
The most popular scenario for dark matter assumes that it consists of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) who were once in thermal equilibrium. In the early hot and dense universe such a particle can efficiently annihilate into familiar particles like photon or electrons, and in this way dark matter is kept in equilibrium with the the rest of the cosmic plasma. The equilibrium ceases to hold when the temperature T of the universe falls below the dark matter particle mass M. In that regime, the number of dark matter particle very quickly decreases - as an exponential $e^{-M/T}$ - and at some point dark matter freezes out: there isn't enough dark matter particles around that they could find each other and annihilate. The surviving particles float around in the universe playing hide and seek with astronomers and physicists alike.
The WIMP scenario is nice and robust but it sheds little light on the surprising fact that the present abundanceof dark matter $\Omega_{DM}$ is very close to that of the ordinary matter who is today dominated by the baryon (proton and neutrons) abundance $\Omega_{B}$. After WMAP data we are confident that the ratio $\Omega_{DM}/\Omega_B$ is roughly five. Of course, one can always cook up the parameters of the WIMP model such that this constraint is satisfied, but nevertheless the proximity of $\Omega_B$ and $\Omega_{DM}$ is intriguing. It may suggests that baryons and dark matter have a common origin. But baryons are definitely NOT a cold relic!
In fact, we don't know for sure what is the origin of baryons in our universe but we have a bunch of ideas that go under the name of baryogenesis. The general idea is that the very early universe contains an equal number of baryons and antibaryons, but at some point in its evolution the fundamental interactions in the plasma produce a tiny $10^{-10}$ asymmetry between matter and antimatter. Once the temperature falls below the baryon mass most of the baryons and anti-baryons annihilate with each other and turn into the sea of photons, leaving only the small unpaired $10^{-10}$ fraction of baryons. These are the protons and neutrons that make galaxies and stars today.
Is it conceivable that dark matter originates in a similar fashion? That is to say, the early universe contains dark matter and anti dark matter particles which almost completely annihilate away leaving only the small asymmetric fraction? Can the dark asymmetry and the baryon asymmetry have the common origin? The answer to these questions is yes, and the first practical realization I'm aware of is due to David B. Kaplan in early nineties. In that model, the dark matter particle carries a charge under an additional U(1) global symmetry who, much as the U(1) baryon symmetry, has a mixed anomaly with the electroweak SU(2) gauge symmetry. Because of the anomalies, non-perturbative electroweak interactions that are effective in the early universe violate both the baryon number and the dark matter number. Then, if some conditions are satisfied, the electroweak phase transition generates the baryon and the dark asymmetries roughly of the same order. At the end of the day on obtains the relation $\Omega_{DM}/\Omega_B \sim m_{DM}/m_{proton}$ and the experimentally measured ratio is recovered if the dark matter particle's mass is around 5 GeV.
Kaplan's original model is long gone for several reasons, but the idea is still floating in the backchannels of model building. The most recent approach in the context of supersymmetry was made by David E. Kaplan et al (David E. Kaplan is a more recent version of David B. Kaplan with more features). In that model, there's no new quantum number invented especially for the dark matter particle; instead, it carries the lepton (or baryon in another version) quantum number. Furthermore, the model does not rely on electroweak baryogenesis but rather it assumes that the the B - L asymmetry is generated at high energies (for example by leptogenesis). That asymmetry is later redistributed between baryons and dark matter by higher-dimensional interactions. When these interactions fall out of equilibrium, dark matter asymmetry is frozen in and one again ends up with $\Omega_{DM}/\Omega_B \sim m_{DM}/ m_{proton}$. All that remains is to find 5-15 GeV dark matter in the sky, or in colliders or by direct detection...
Intriguing. I did not know about the purported connection between relic densities and baryogenesis (shame on me).
ReplyDeletePerhaps the next question is: can we obtain clear signals for 5 GeV dark matter particles at the LHC? This is food for thought.
Obviously it's model dependent. One experimental problem is that this kind of dark matter does not need a sizable annihilation cross-section (unlike WIMPs) which can make it more elusive.
ReplyDeleteJust an ignorant question. The baryogenesis model says that most of the energy in particles originally went into photons because of anti-matter annihilation. When people talk about these omega numbers for the universe, 5% Baryons, 20 some percent dark matter or whatever. (ought to be called transparent matter to me) Where does the energy from all these anti-matter photons get added in? Seems like it should be reflected there somewhere. Is it just thrown in with the regular matter?
ReplyDeleteThe energy (or better entropy) of most matter and antimatter is still there in the photons. But the energy of relativistic particles like the photons gets quickly red-shifted by the expansion of the universe. Today, photons contribute only some 10^(-4) to the total Omega of the universe.
ReplyDeleteI think these baryogenesis/dark matter models must somehow model the early universe. And, I guess, that's done with some kind of SUSY/non-SUSY GUT. So, I wonder how robust are those predictions against variations of the underlying GUT. After all, it might happen that the physics beyond the SM is not a GUT, or a GUT that has not been discovered yet.
ReplyDelete@Chuck
ReplyDeleteSince the standard model as it stands can't explain baryogenesis successfully, every model that tries to explain it has to make certain assumptions about some type of physics beyond the SM. This ranges from supersymmetry over heavy righthanded neutrinos to whatever exotic theory you could imagine.
Since in most models baryogenesis takes place at temperatures below the GUT scale it is actually quite robust against variations of a underlying GUT theory.
One could say that some popular models of baryogenesis can be embedded into a GUT theory but their success does not depend on the actual presence of that GUT.
In the end, who knows...
There was a paper by Strumia recently who said that Kaplan's idea can also be realized with a few TeV DM particle...
ReplyDeleteNot based on a model, but using correspondences between the pattern of elements of the standard model and special unitary and pseudounitary subalgebras of sl(4,C), I've arrived at a prediction that dark matter is composed of an equivalent of the hydrogen atom made up of 4 quark like particles (~leptons + quarks with the symmetry breakage between them removed), which I've set out in a paper "The pattern of Reality" published in "Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras" volume 18,(1).
ReplyDelete